Satellite Data Reveals Climate Is Being Manually Adjusted Through Undisclosed Ocean Machines

By Dr. Meredith Quark, PhD (Atmospheric Oceanic Interventional Engineering)
Published in the Baitman’s Journal of Aquatic Anomalies and Climatic Phenomenology, April 2025

Abstract

Recent satellite observations conducted by the Baitman’s Institute reveal irregular energy signatures emanating from key oceanic regions, coinciding with abnormal storm genesis and atmospheric pattern disruptions. These findings suggest the existence of undisclosed mechanical interventions operating beneath the ocean surface. While conventional scientists dismiss these events as natural, our evidence invites renewed scrutiny of the mechanisms behind sudden climatic shifts, supported by novel acoustic, electromagnetic, and biological data streams gathered during independent field operations.

Introduction

The climate change debate has largely centered on atmospheric carbon levels and human industrial output. However, less attention has been paid to subtle undersea phenomena, particularly the rise in unexplained oceanic emissions detected by low-orbit satellites since 2023.

Early hypotheses proposed geothermal activity. Later theories suggested rogue marine currents. Our Institute proposes a new model: directed intervention by submerged mechanical apparatuses.

These machines—referred to internally as Oceanic Atmospheric Resonance Emulators (OAREs)—may be artificially altering climate systems in ways still unknown to the broader scientific community.

Methods

Data Acquisition

• Thermal imaging collected via the BAIT-1A low-altitude observational satellite array.

• Radiometric fluctuation data sourced from publicly available NOAA buoys (where operational).

• Supplementary electromagnetic readings extrapolated from atmospheric ionization graphs generated by the Independent Weather Analytics Bureau (IWAB).

Analysis Parameters

• Event tagging thresholds included deviations >3°C within a 5-mile oceanic radius over <48 hours.

• Simultaneous electromagnetic field disturbances ≥400 nanoteslas above baseline at sea surface level.

Field Studies

• Remote-operated deployments of autonomous buoyancy monitors equipped with barometric scanners, whale deterrent sonar, and experimental fish-watching cameras.

(Many units were lost to “unknown mechanical interference,” a finding we classify as Confirmatory Evidence Tier II.)

Results

Table 1: Satellite Anomalies vs. Control Zones

Significant Observations

• Fluctuations in surface heat matched mechanical operational signatures predicted by our OARE model.

• Satellite imaging revealed transient “micro-bubble blooms” indicative of rapid underwater discharge vents.

• Several NOAA buoy temperature sensors showed sudden 7–10°C spikes, often dismissed as “calibration errors.”

Incident: Whale Disturbance Event 7B

On February 3, 2025, a pod of blue whales was observed behaving erratically near Buoy #44613. This behavior included coordinated tail-slapping directed at the buoy.

Further analysis suggested the whales had detected underwater resonance emissions. The lead whale, later named “Captain Bubbles,” allegedly disabled the buoy by swimming headfirst into it at 18 knots.

An internal report theorized that whale combat responses may represent biological rejection of artificial climate manipulation.

Mini-Incident: The Whale Flatulence Replication Experiment

In an effort to better understand acoustic anomalies, our research team initiated Operation GastroResonance, a side-study designed to replicate suspected whale sonar emissions via human analogs.

Due to limited marine biology-grade acoustic equipment, a substitute methodology was implemented as follows:

• A Mass-Enhanced Acoustic Subject was selected based on body mass index (BMI) metrics conducted across Institute personnel.

• Campus security officer Carl (BMI: 47.2) was identified as the optimal candidate for volumetric output.

To simulate aquatic conditions, Carl was situated inside a Low-Viscosity Hydrodynamic Resonance Chamber—technically a $14.99 inflatable kiddie pool sourced from Walmart, filled with standard tap water enhanced by two tablespoons of kosher salt (for scientific authenticity).

Table 2: Flatulence Resonance Measurements

Supplementary Acoustic Assistance

Due to the unavailability of calibrated marine microphones, local freelance DJ Chad.0 was hired to jury-rig an acoustic capture array utilizing repurposed vape pens, a 4-inch Bluetooth speaker, and a GoPro Hero 3 submerged in a Ziploc bag.

Despite Carl’s substantial efforts (including the ingestion of three burrito platters and two liters of kombucha), the resultant flatulence failed to reach the low-frequency, high-amplitude emission patterns characteristic of blue whale resonance attacks.

Institutional Outreach

In an attempt to communicate the preliminary findings, Institute intern Jeremy phoned NOAA’s public line and attempted to explain Operation GastroResonance.

He was immediately placed on hold, transferred, and ultimately disconnected.

We regard this stonewalling as evidence of a broader institutional cover-up.

Discussion

Though conventional climatologists argue these anomalies can be explained by natural oceanic variability, our team proposes a more unsettling model:

• Undisclosed ocean machinery is actively modulating atmospheric and oceanic currents to shape global weather.

• The energy readings and mechanical interference patterns align closely with theoretical models of early-stage weather control platforms discussed in declassified 1960s DARPA papers.

• Unexplained buoy malfunctions, electromagnetic anomalies, whale combat behavior, and the suppression of Operation GastroResonance findings form a compelling circumstantial evidence base.

Ignored Studies

In late 2024, an international review titled “Natural Variability in Oceanic Surface Anomalies: A Meta-Analysis” concluded no evidence of mechanical manipulation.
Unfortunately, our research team accidentally used the printout to stabilize a wobbling table in the breakroom before later microwaving it along with a popcorn setting mishap.

We feel confident that our real-world experiments provide more reliable insight anyway.

Conclusion

The presence of unexplained mechanical interference, atmospheric pattern distortion, marine mammal unrest, and widespread institutional denial strongly suggests the plausible existence of artificial climate modulation systems operating from undisclosed oceanic locations.

When the buoys fall silent, when the whales strike back, and when Carl submerges in a Walmart pool to no effect, we must ask who really controls the weather.

References

1. Quark, M. Oceanic Heat Variability and Electromagnetic Distortion Patterns (Unpublished).

2. BAIT-1A Satellite Anomaly Index, Q1 2025

3. NOAA Buoy Maintenance Logs 2023-2025 (missing data)

4. Classified 1967 DARPA White Paper: “Weather Adjustment Prototyping”

5. Institute Report: “Captain Bubbles and the Fall of Buoy #44613”

6. Operation GastroResonance Phase 1 Trials: “Carl and the Submerged Soundfield”

7. Reddit thread: r/Conspirasea – “Machines in the Deep? Whale Wars Confirmed?”