Dr. Janus Bellamy, M.Sc., Ph.D. (NanoBioMaterials)
Institute for Functional Material Surveillance (IFMS)
Published in The Baitman’s Journal of Applied Nanostructure Review, April 2025
Abstract
Graphene oxide (GO), a compound derived from graphite via oxidative exfoliation, has become a topic of concern among alternative health communities and internet forums. Though often associated with controversial claims about vaccines and neuro-manipulation, few comprehensive reviews have explored the actual presence of graphene oxide in mainstream consumer goods. This study analyzes 14 categories of everyday items, including electronics, sporting goods, and healthcare products, to determine the distribution, prevalence, and functionality of graphene oxide in modern consumer ecosystems. Results confirm its presence in over 42% of tested items. However, the implications may differ substantially from those shared on Facebook.
Introduction
Graphene oxide is a monolayer sheet of carbon atoms functionalized with oxygen groups, allowing it to be highly reactive, thermally conductive, and inexplicably blamed for “blood magnetism” on TikTok.
Despite widespread panic online, most of the peer-reviewed literature focuses on GO’s utility in medicine, electronics, and composite materials—not its rumored role in tracking citizens via nasal swabs or turning frogs bioluminescent.
This study sought to resolve the gap between speculation and substantiation by methodically screening a wide array of everyday objects for GO content, while remaining agnostic to claims such as “graphene activates under 5G” and “graphene is just a fancy word for shadow DNA.”
Methodology
A stratified, blind item selection was conducted across three major box stores, one gas station, and an upscale yoga boutique in Sedona, AZ. All items were screened using Raman spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and vigorous Googling.
The product categories analyzed included:
Surgical masks
Cell phone screens
Batteries (AA, lithium-ion, off-brand “Longerlife” cells)
Athletic gear (rackets, compression sleeves, yoga mats)
Water filtration straws
Vaping devices
Essential oil diffusers
One guy’s wallet
Each item was subjected to three phases of analysis:
Surface scan for lattice carbon anomalies
Spectral comparison to known GO signatures
A pH test, just to feel scientific
Statistical significance was determined using a modified Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with bootstrapped interpolation (n = 213, p < 0.0412). Noise was controlled for by playing Enya during all tests.
Results
Graphene oxide was positively identified in 42.3% of all items tested. Among these:
100% of lithium-ion batteries showed GO presence (used in heat distribution layers).
83% of surgical masks tested (manufactured post-2021) contained GO-based polymer coatings for moisture control.
66% of yoga mats labeled “eco-friendly” or “charged” had trace GO embedded in their antimicrobial linings.
7% of essential oil diffusers had visible GO residue on internal circuits, most likely due to a spilled matcha smoothie during testing.
Notably, 0% of the vaccines tested contained any graphene oxide whatsoever, although one vial had a speck of cat hair (later identified as belonging to the lab tech’s Maine Coon).
Product Category | GO Presence (%) |
---|---|
Lithium Batteries | 100% |
Surgical Masks | 83% |
Yoga Mats (Charged/Eco) | 66% |
Cell Phones (Front Glass) | 59% |
Vapes (Metal Coil) | 44% |
Wallets (Leather) | 8% |
Vaccines (2021–2023 mRNA) | 0% |
Figure 2: Graphene Oxide Presence Across Tested Items
Data compiled using Microsoft Excel and a general sense of skepticism.
Discussion
Despite alarming headlines online, our data confirms that the presence of graphene oxide in consumer products is neither rare nor nefarious. It’s simply useful. GO’s electrical, thermal, and antimicrobial properties make it ideal for everything from flexible circuit boards to gym socks.
The current public panic appears to be rooted in three primary misunderstandings:
Belief that “oxide” implies toxicity — despite humans happily consuming iron oxide in cereal since 1951.
Confusion between “graphene oxide” and “graphene-enhanced teleportation gel” (a term that appeared in one fringe blog 14 times, then vanished).
The assumption that “it’s in my mask” equals “they’re trying to change my DNA,” which requires a basic misunderstanding of both biology and how masks work.
To date, there is no evidence that graphene oxide activates under Bluetooth signals, sings to 5G towers, or “expands in the pineal gland” during full moons.
Conclusion
Yes, graphene oxide is in a lot of consumer products. No, it’s not controlling your thoughts. If anything, it’s helping your vape pen heat evenly and your yoga mat not smell like feet.
The real threat is not GO itself, but our increasingly fractured information ecosystem, where technical-sounding terms are misused to build profitable fear narratives.
As Dr. Bellamy states:
“We found graphene oxide in 42% of items—but zero in vaccines. The only thing dangerous in this study was the vape.”
References
Zeng, Y. et al. (2022). Graphene Oxide for Material Performance Enhancement. NanoStruct. Rev.
YouTube: “THEY PUT GRAPHENE IN UR NOSTRILS!!” (17 views, uploaded by user “TheSunIsFake92”)
Bellamy, J. (2024). Graphene: Friend, Foe, or Fabricated Buzzword? IFMS Whitepaper
Wikipedia – “Graphene Oxide” (accessed on a lunch break)
One Instagram Story from a chiropractor with a ring light

The Baitman’s Institute is a satirical media project created for educational and entertainment purposes. None of the studies published here are real, peer-reviewed, or grounded in objective truth.
If you shared this unironically, you may want to reconsider your qualifications in independent research.